SF Prep

Supreme Court: fees for professional courses cannot be raised midstream; fee for entire course to be notified before admission

On 14 October 2026, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe held that fees for professional courses in self-financing institutions cannot be changed midstream except in exceptional circumstances, and the fee for the entire course must be notified before admission.

Summary

The Supreme Court, in Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College v. State of West Bengal (judgment dated 14 October 2026), held that the fee payable for professional courses in self-financing higher education institutions cannot be changed midstream. A Bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe said authorities must determine and notify the fee for the entire course before admission, allowing adjustment only in exceptional cases such as extraordinary economic conditions or statutory changes. The court cited the AICTE Regulations, 1994, under which fees can be revised only on a committee's recommendation with a minimum gap of three years, and the National Education Policy, 2020. It noted NSSO data showing professional course fees to be 711% higher than those of general courses.

Key facts

Case
Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Ors. (2026 INSC 1120)
Date
14 October 2026
Bench
Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe
Ruling
No midstream fee hike in professional courses, except exceptional circumstances
Direction
Fee for the entire course to be notified before admission
AICTE Regulations, 1994
Revision only on committee recommendation; minimum gap of 3 years
Also cited
National Education Policy (NEP) 2020
NSSO data cited
Professional course fees 711% higher than general courses
Background
West Bengal fees last revised in 2016-17

Practice MCQs 3 questions

Q1

Which Supreme Court Bench held in October 2026 that fees for professional courses cannot be changed midstream except in exceptional circumstances?

Show answer

Correct answer: D — Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe

Supreme Court judgment (14 October 2026) and The Hindu: the ruling was given by a Bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe.
Q2 Advanced

Under the AICTE Regulations, 1994, cited by the Supreme Court in its October 2026 fee ruling, fees for professional colleges can be revised with a minimum gap of how many years?

Show answer

Correct answer: A — 3 years

Supreme Court judgment: under Regulations 7(1), 7(4) and 7(5) of the AICTE Regulations 1994, fees can be revised only on the Committee's recommendation with a minimum gap of 3 years.
Q3 Advanced

According to NSSO data cited by the Supreme Court in its October 2026 ruling, fees for professional courses are how much higher than those for general courses?

Show answer

Correct answer: B — 711%

Supreme Court judgment and The Hindu: NSSO data showed professional course fees to be 711% higher than general courses.

← All current affairs