SF Prep

Supreme Court: Right to access internet is a fundamental right under Article 21 read with 19(1)(a), children included; blanket bans no answer

In an order dated 15 October 2026, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran held that the right to access and use the internet is a fundamental right under Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a), available to children too.

Summary

The Supreme Court held that the right to access and use the internet is a fundamental right of every individual under Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, and that children of any age enjoy the same right. The order, dated 15 October 2026 and made public on 17 October, was passed by a Bench of Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran on a petition by the NGO Just Rights for Children Alliance about Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Material (CSEAM) online. The Court said blanket bans on children’s internet use are disproportionate and suggested parental oversight, age-appropriate safeguards and a dedicated ‘child mode’ instead. It noted that Anuradha Bhasin (2020) had protected speech and business through the internet under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) but had left open whether internet access itself is a fundamental right.

Key facts

Court
Supreme Court of India
Bench
Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran
Order date
15 October 2026 (made public 17 October)
Held
Right to access and use the internet is a fundamental right
Constitutional basis
Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a)
Petitioner
NGO Just Rights for Children Alliance (CSEAM case)
Suggested safeguards
Parental consent/oversight, dedicated ‘child mode’, private-by-default accounts
Earlier case
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (10 January 2020) – Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g)

Practice MCQs 3 questions

Q1

In October 2026, the Supreme Court held that the right to access and use the internet is a fundamental right under which provisions of the Constitution?

Show answer

Correct answer: C — Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a)

The Hindu/Indian Express: The Bench held that the right to access and use the internet is a fundamental right under Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a).
Q2 Advanced

The October 2026 Supreme Court order holding that children too have a fundamental right to access the internet was passed by a Bench of which judges?

Show answer

Correct answer: D — Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran

The Hindu/Indian Express: The order was passed by a Bench of Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran.
Q3 Advanced

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court’s October 2026 order on children’s internet access: 1. The Court suggested parental oversight and a dedicated ‘child mode’ instead of blanket bans on children’s internet use. 2. The Court said the 2020 Anuradha Bhasin judgment had already declared internet access by itself a fundamental right. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer

Correct answer: A — 1 only

Indian Express/The Hindu: The Court favoured parental consent, oversight and a dedicated ‘child mode’ over blanket bans (1 correct). It noted that Anuradha Bhasin (2020) protected speech and business through the internet under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) but left open whether internet access itself is a fundamental right (2 incorrect).

← All current affairs