SF Prep Notes

FIU-IND issues non-compliance notices to 15 offshore virtual digital asset service providers under the PMLA

On 9 September 2026, the Financial Intelligence Unit-India issued notices to 15 Virtual Digital Asset Service Providers under Section 13 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and sought takedown of their apps and URLs.

Summary

The Financial Intelligence Unit-India (FIU-IND) issued non-compliance notices on 9 September 2026 to 15 Virtual Digital Asset Service Providers (VDA SPs), including Weex, Blofin, Bitunix, DigiFinex, XT.com, Pionex, ChangeNow and WhiteBIT, under Section 13 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). Acting as nodal officer under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the FIU-IND Director also issued notices to take down their apps and URLs for operating illegally in India without complying with the PMLA. VDA SPs were brought under India's anti-money laundering and counter-terror financing framework under the PMLA in March 2023.

Key facts

Action
Notices to 15 VDA service providers — 9 Sep 2026
Law
Section 13, PMLA 2002
Takedown
Under Section 79(3)(b), IT Act 2000
Examples
Weex, Blofin, Bitunix, DigiFinex, XT.com, Pionex, WhiteBIT
Background
VDA SPs under AML/CFT framework since March 2023

Practice MCQs 3 questions

Q1

Under which section of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 did FIU-IND issue notices to 15 VDA service providers on 9 September 2026?

Show answer

Correct answer: D — Section 13

The notices were issued under Section 13 of the PMLA.

Q2 Advanced

Since when have Virtual Digital Asset Service Providers been covered by India's AML/CFT framework under the PMLA?

Show answer

Correct answer: B — March 2023

VDA SPs were brought under the AML/CFT framework of the PMLA in March 2023.

Q3 Advanced

Consider the following about FIU-IND's action of 9 September 2026 against VDA service providers: 1. FIU-IND also sought takedown of their apps and URLs as nodal officer under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, 2000. 2. Notices were issued to 25 entities. Which of the above is/are correct?

Show answer

Correct answer: A — 1 only

Only statement 1 is correct. The FIU-IND Director issued takedown notices under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act; notices went to 15 entities, not 25.

← All current affairs